steve2189 wrote:wrc559 wrote:
*I would prefer to keep my lifetime key.
**New model should be used on new customers and not old customers. Like most companies who offer first in best dressed - First comers who "found" the software and "assisted" in creating what it is today get to keep their old setup, where as new comers pay the new fees.
I agree.
I own some Malwarebytes Anti-malware lifetime licenses, they recently went through a similar process. The original licenses were lifetime licenses, and then they changed to yearly subscriptions. Malwarebytes honoured the lifetime license for their original customers (who are "grandfathered in" to the new plan) and applied the yearly subscriptions only to their new customers. I think that is the fairest way to handle the situation.
Normally I would agree with you fellas. I do think MBAM Should stick behind the lifetime licenses. Especially since I make a lot of money selling them.

As far as ZoHo goes, yea, it stands to to reason that people would be grandfathered in. Both ZoHo and Malwarebytes spends thousands of dollars advertising. They both have R&D departments. They have office buildings that are thousands of square feet.
In MBAMs case they stood to loose LOT of money if they kept up with that scheme so they were forced to drop it. With ZoHo, they just decided the next round of people needed to pay more money so they could pay the employees better.
You know what ZoHo and Malwarebytes has in common? They are multi-million dollar companies.
You know what they have in common with Fred? Well, they are in the same business.... kinda.
I'm having a hard time thinking of a program which is in a boat like UVK. Can someone help me think of a program that is still in existence in which all of it's customers for the first few years never paid another single dime to the program? I'm coming up with a lot of freeware, I can think of a whole ton of people using really old versions of software. But, I can't think of another like UVK.......