Smart Uninstaller

Use this forum to report bugs you find in the software.
Forum rules
We have no special rules for UVK forums. Just try to be polite and clear in your posts.
Please don't post spam in this forum. Spammers will be banned by IP, e-mail and username.
We reserve the right to delete all posts and ban all users we consider not having respected these rules without warning.
Charger440
Posts: 1529
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 7:44 am
Location: Missouri

Re: Smart Uninstaller

Post by Charger440 »

I like the feed back just like bill said. However, I actually wish UVK was more vocal. It's kind of unrelated but when it comes to popups and telling you about things... The reason for why a script fails is pretty much non-existent. It's much easier to debug a script when you know why it did not work....

To the contrary to what Xander says, I do not want a script to be totally silent. I want it to be automated but I also want it to tell me what it is doing, what it has done and what it plans to do. to me that is important information.
Jim

It is not "Can it be done?" but rather, "How can we do it?"
Xander
Posts: 440
Joined: Sun May 24, 2015 11:55 pm
Contact:

Re: Smart Uninstaller

Post by Xander »

Charger440 wrote:I want it to be automated but I also want it to tell me what it is doing, what it has done and what it plans to do.
It's not "automated" if you have to keep clicking "OK" at every step.
Charger440
Posts: 1529
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 7:44 am
Location: Missouri

Re: Smart Uninstaller

Post by Charger440 »

Xander, I understand that your idea of automated is like another software (no, not that one) but when you do that, you run it and wait and wait. Then when it finally gets done, it says "all done." You then have to go digging for logs and try to find out what happened or just take it's word for it that something happened. If that's the way you want to do it, that's great but I like information and clicking OK ever so often is not that a big a deal.

I hope that if Fred likes your Idea that he makes it an option so that I have my info and you can assume it worked.
Jim

It is not "Can it be done?" but rather, "How can we do it?"
Charger440
Posts: 1529
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 7:44 am
Location: Missouri

Re: Smart Uninstaller

Post by Charger440 »

Xander

My suggestion for that "other software" would be this:

Code: Select all

K-Lite Codec Pack Full=(Not set)
You can specify "(Not set)" and it should work by program name based on the look of the INI file.
Jim

It is not "Can it be done?" but rather, "How can we do it?"
Fred
Site Admin
Posts: 2370
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2011 12:05 pm
Location: Red coast, France
Contact:

Re: Smart Uninstaller

Post by Fred »

Xander's suggestion of white/black listing by publisher seems interesting. Any comments on this idea?
One thing we humans have in common is that we are all different. So, if you think you're weird because you're different from everyone else, then we are all weird.

Fred
wmmiller
Posts: 1098
Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2012 6:02 am
Location: Minnesota, USA

Re: Smart Uninstaller

Post by wmmiller »

That wouldn’t be my first choice I don’t think but maybe we could have a sort option.
Play stupid games….win stupid prizes
Fred
Site Admin
Posts: 2370
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2011 12:05 pm
Location: Red coast, France
Contact:

Re: Smart Uninstaller

Post by Fred »

Bill, If you mean "A sort option for the uninstall list", you do have it, but you need to switch to Details view.

I was talking about white/black listing publishers. Like "Never show Microsoft uninstall entries", or "Always select IObit entries.
One thing we humans have in common is that we are all different. So, if you think you're weird because you're different from everyone else, then we are all weird.

Fred
wmmiller
Posts: 1098
Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2012 6:02 am
Location: Minnesota, USA

Re: Smart Uninstaller

Post by wmmiller »

I meant for the white/black listings. I don’t know if I would want to just white/black list everything from any vender. Microsoft Maybe. Unless I misunderstood what was asked.
Play stupid games….win stupid prizes
Fred
Site Admin
Posts: 2370
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2011 12:05 pm
Location: Red coast, France
Contact:

Re: Smart Uninstaller

Post by Fred »

No, you understood perfectly well. Thanks for giving your opinion, Bill.
One thing we humans have in common is that we are all different. So, if you think you're weird because you're different from everyone else, then we are all weird.

Fred
Charger440
Posts: 1529
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 7:44 am
Location: Missouri

Re: Smart Uninstaller

Post by Charger440 »

I thought he was wanting to list by program name because some crapware does not list a publisher. Actually, some legit stuff does not either as you see in the example above.

I'm totally cool with it as long as it works :)
Jim

It is not "Can it be done?" but rather, "How can we do it?"
Fred
Site Admin
Posts: 2370
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2011 12:05 pm
Location: Red coast, France
Contact:

Re: Smart Uninstaller

Post by Fred »

Charger440 wrote:I thought he was wanting to list by program name because some crapware does not list a publisher. Actually, some legit stuff does not either as you see in the example above.
Correct. But using (not set) as you mentioned would match the programs whose Publisher field is empty.
One thing we humans have in common is that we are all different. So, if you think you're weird because you're different from everyone else, then we are all weird.

Fred
Brink
Posts: 283
Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2014 3:36 pm

Re: Smart Uninstaller

Post by Brink »

I like the idea of blacklisted uninstall entries.
Post Reply