[Fixed] 7.6.6 watermark
Forum rules
We have no special rules for UVK forums. Just try to be polite and clear in your posts.
Please don't post spam in this forum. Spammers will be banned by IP, e-mail and username.
We reserve the right to delete all posts and ban all users we consider not having respected these rules without warning.
We have no special rules for UVK forums. Just try to be polite and clear in your posts.
Please don't post spam in this forum. Spammers will be banned by IP, e-mail and username.
We reserve the right to delete all posts and ban all users we consider not having respected these rules without warning.
[Fixed] 7.6.6 watermark
7.6.6 watermark: Now that's a lot of hours. I couldn't tell you if previous versions did this.
Re: 7.6.6 watermark
P.S Thats like 9 billion 360 million+ years My computer must be the one that's running the simulation.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simulation_hypothesis
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simulation_hypothesis
Re: 7.6.6 watermark
Thanks, Brink. I'll see if I can find the bug.
One thing we humans have in common is that we are all different. So, if you think you're weird because you're different from everyone else, then we are all weird.
Fred
Fred
Re: 7.6.6 watermark
Brink, can you please check if the System info section shows the same thing? Thanks.
One thing we humans have in common is that we are all different. So, if you think you're weird because you're different from everyone else, then we are all weird.
Fred
Fred
Re: 7.6.6 watermark
Brink, do you mind to test this file I attached. You just need to extract to a folder and run DesktopWatermark.bat. Let me know if it's OK now.
Thanks
Thanks
One thing we humans have in common is that we are all different. So, if you think you're weird because you're different from everyone else, then we are all weird.
Fred
Fred
-
- Posts: 1529
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 7:44 am
- Location: Missouri
Re: 7.6.6 watermark
Every once i a while you find a bug that makes you laugh... This is one of them. That is one OLD hard drive!
I just hope Fred don't pull his hair out fixing this watermark thing!
I just hope Fred don't pull his hair out fixing this watermark thing!
Jim
It is not "Can it be done?" but rather, "How can we do it?"
It is not "Can it be done?" but rather, "How can we do it?"
-
- Posts: 1529
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 7:44 am
- Location: Missouri
Re: 7.6.6 watermark
Was trying to figure out where this post should go... We have a lot of watermark threads going on right now so I guess here is as good a place as any...
Is there a reason that some drives say what they are and others just give status and hours? It's not that important to me but was thinking in terms of consistency of the information.
Is there a reason that some drives say what they are and others just give status and hours? It's not that important to me but was thinking in terms of consistency of the information.
Jim
It is not "Can it be done?" but rather, "How can we do it?"
It is not "Can it be done?" but rather, "How can we do it?"
Re: 7.6.6 watermark
I've got drive status now but, between my PC and the one on my bench, all show drive model; none show Work Hours. Seeing drive health now is a step-up from before.
Re: 7.6.6 watermark
Because there's only so much info that can be shown in one line, if the application can't retrieve the POWER_ON_HOUR_COUNT SMART value, it shows the name of the drive. I haven't found a hard drive I could not get the work hours value yet, except for pen drives. When I got one, maybe I will be able to fix whatever is wrong in your case.
Maybe those drives have SMART disabled? Can you guys get the POWER_ON_HOUR_COUNT using a different application?
Maybe those drives have SMART disabled? Can you guys get the POWER_ON_HOUR_COUNT using a different application?
One thing we humans have in common is that we are all different. So, if you think you're weird because you're different from everyone else, then we are all weird.
Fred
Fred
-
- Posts: 1529
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 7:44 am
- Location: Missouri
Re: 7.6.6 watermark
Fred,
I just ran 7.6.7 again and made sure to run the watermark. This what I got and it does seem correct.
I just ran 7.6.7 again and made sure to run the watermark. This what I got and it does seem correct.
Jim
It is not "Can it be done?" but rather, "How can we do it?"
It is not "Can it be done?" but rather, "How can we do it?"
Re: 7.6.6 watermark
Now that's good news! I like it better that way.
One thing we humans have in common is that we are all different. So, if you think you're weird because you're different from everyone else, then we are all weird.
Fred
Fred
-
- Posts: 1529
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 7:44 am
- Location: Missouri
Re: 7.6.6 watermark
I will test it on a few other computers and let you know how that goes but it is correct for my office computer.
Jim
It is not "Can it be done?" but rather, "How can we do it?"
It is not "Can it be done?" but rather, "How can we do it?"
Re: 7.6.6 watermark
Sorry for the delay. This is what I get when I run DesktopWatermark.zip.
Then Running it again just a minute or two later I get
milliseconds?
Then Running it again just a minute or two later I get
milliseconds?
Re: 7.6.6 watermark
Dug up an old junker laptop and Work Hours are reporting on that (hours agrees with CrystalDisk)
Make that two junker laptops.
Fred, the "PC Identification" string seems to get saved to the INI file so, once I've saved my 'master' settings on my main PC, its PCName/User gets saved to the file and carries over to any other PCs I'm running it on. Could that be set to allow for a couple of variables like %computername% and %user%? For the mean time, I've just put in some generic text.
Make that two junker laptops.
Fred, the "PC Identification" string seems to get saved to the INI file so, once I've saved my 'master' settings on my main PC, its PCName/User gets saved to the file and carries over to any other PCs I'm running it on. Could that be set to allow for a couple of variables like %computername% and %user%? For the mean time, I've just put in some generic text.
Re: 7.6.6 watermark
Xander I totally forgot about that request, sorry about that. That makes perfect sense, I'll add it right away, and also make it the default.
One thing we humans have in common is that we are all different. So, if you think you're weird because you're different from everyone else, then we are all weird.
Fred
Fred
Re: 7.6.6 watermark
Brink, No, it's not milliseconds. I was copying all the six bytes of the SMART raw value, instead of just 4, which is the size of a 32-bit integer.
That issue should be already fixed in the beta 7.6.7.
Here's what I figured out from your image:
86376087306502 = (HEX)4E8F 0000 4106 (6 bytes)
But if we use only the four lower bytes, it will make 0000 4106, which is 16646 (decimal), the same as shown by CDI.
That issue should be already fixed in the beta 7.6.7.
Here's what I figured out from your image:
86376087306502 = (HEX)4E8F 0000 4106 (6 bytes)
But if we use only the four lower bytes, it will make 0000 4106, which is 16646 (decimal), the same as shown by CDI.
One thing we humans have in common is that we are all different. So, if you think you're weird because you're different from everyone else, then we are all weird.
Fred
Fred
Re: 7.6.7
7.6.7 Not fixed yet. Not like it really matters though unless it has become a challenge that all the fibers of you being must rise up and meet. LOL
If you must rise and conquer PM me and I'll set you up with team viewer so you can look to see about it and run your own tests. Let me know. Otherwise it's really no big deal to me. I was only trying to let you know that it doesn't work as expected on this PC.
If you must rise and conquer PM me and I'll set you up with team viewer so you can look to see about it and run your own tests. Let me know. Otherwise it's really no big deal to me. I was only trying to let you know that it doesn't work as expected on this PC.
Re: 7.6.6 watermark
I thought maybe you would also like to know that sometimes it shows nothing for hours.
I don't know why it didn't occur to me to mention that before. Sorry
I don't know why it didn't occur to me to mention that before. Sorry
Re: 7.6.6 watermark
Thanks, Brink.
In fact, what I did in version version 6.7.6 didn't make any difference, regarding to this. It should be fixed now, in version 6.7.8. Sorry about that.
In fact, what I did in version version 6.7.6 didn't make any difference, regarding to this. It should be fixed now, in version 6.7.8. Sorry about that.
One thing we humans have in common is that we are all different. So, if you think you're weird because you're different from everyone else, then we are all weird.
Fred
Fred
Re: 7.6.6 watermark
Thanks Fred. (That was 7.6.7) Go to bed! What time is it over there? How many sleepless nights have you spent taking care of our nitpickings?
I'm sure I speak for us all when I say: We appreciate you and thanks for all that you do.
I'm sure I speak for us all when I say: We appreciate you and thanks for all that you do.